|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jail inmate classification, corrections or correctional prisoner classification, probation case classification training, parole success classification training or correctional program classification training are our specialties?
We also offer detention facility classification, corrections program eligibility classification , field probation case management and risk assessment classification systems trial consultation of defending classification methods and classification techniques in jails, lockups, detention facilities, corrections correctional institutions, and adult and juvenile classification expert witness services.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
The complete website for networking in institutional offender classification
|
|
|
|
Operational Systems and Models of Inmate Classification
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification Principles
There are only two (2) ways to classify
1. Separate not Segregate
(Isolation)
Or
2. Estimate Compatibility
(Assess Risk Factors)
|
|
| Often Imitated Never Equaled |
|
| We Offer Customized Classification Training for:
We also offer classification specialty Case assessment and Expert Witness Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific Types or Models of Classification Systems
(Form Design is Essential to an Effective System)
1. Subjective Classification
2. Objective Classification
3. Predictive Social Model Classification
4. Behavior Based Just Deserts Classification
5. Directive Charge Based Classification
6. Security Level Risk Assessment Classification
7. Combination Models (2 or more of other types)
|
|
|
2. Objective Classification Models
Also known as the "points system", objective classification applies predetermined "values" (points) to specific management decision criteria.
It is not necessary to have a Points System for objective classification.
Objective classification systems normally require a working model of one of the other types of systems to test OUTCOME. Objective systems are most effective when known factors, criteria, data are measured over a period of time for validation.
Objective systems require trained and professional classification staff if the system is to not be abused by overrides, deliberate math mistakes or misuse of administrative prerogatives. An objective system can easily become a subjective system if staff chooses to do so. See example at the end of this section on page _____ .
Objective systems require measurable and verifiable decision making factors. These data items are given weight depending on importance to overall risk assessment. These values or weights can be adjusted to ensure a desired outcome.
"(Objective) classification can serve important planning and monitoring functions. (objective) classification implies the need for a process of systematic data collection and analysis of the data to guide administrative decisions on future correctional policies. Centralization of data collection and analysis tasks makes it possible to evaluate trends in population flow, inmate characteristic s, jail decision making processes, and the impact of programmatic, administrative, and legal reforms on staff and inmates behavior."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sample ClassificationForm for this Type of Classification System |
|
 |
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naber Technical Enterprises
530-887-0122 Office
530-887-1092 FAX
581 Sawka Drive, Suite B
Auburn, CA. 95603
E-Mail bnaber@nteusa.org
|
|
|
|
Updated 4/11/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|