|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jail inmate classification, corrections or correctional prisoner classification, probation case classification training, parole success classification training or correctional program classification training are our specialties?
We also offer detention facility classification, corrections program eligibility classification , field probation case management and risk assessment classification systems trial consultation of defending classification methods and classification techniques in jails, lockups, detention facilities, corrections correctional institutions, and adult and juvenile classification expert witness services.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
The complete website for networking in institutional offender classification
|
|
|
|
Operational Systems and Models of Inmate Classification
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification Rules
Classification Rule #1:
Classification is architecturally driven!
|
|
| Often Imitated Never Equaled |
|
| We Offer Customized Classification Training for:
We also offer classification specialty Case assessment and Expert Witness Services
|
|
|
|
|
Specific Types or Models of Classification Systems
(Form Design is Essential to an Effective System)
1. Subjective Classification
2. Objective Classification
3. Predictive Social Model Classification
4. Behavior Based Just Deserts Classification
5. Directive Charge Based Classification
6. Security Level Risk Assessment Classification
7. Combination Models (2 or more of other types)
|
|
1. Subjective Classification
This is the traditional model of inmate classification found in most adult detention facilities.
A subjective system is a generalist approach to assigning inmates to various categories of controls and services based on "immediate belief" of persons making classification decisions. Little or no research or verification is required, or desired. Past practice, how the inmate was housed and handled before is a typical outcome.
Speed and simplicity are important reasons for using a subjective system.
Subjective systems normally operate under the "bed space" principle for a given category of inmate. Inmates not "fitting" a specific category are allowed to be placed and/or managed in whatever is available.
Subjective classification allows for and relies on "officer memory and opinion". This method affords classifying officers a great deal of discretion and wide latitudes of decision making, usually outside supervisory or administrative control.
Subjective systems tend to place extraordinary emphasis on control and restriction. These controls tend to over-classify offenders into single cells with maximum restraint of movement. There would be little, if any, out-of-cell time to limit the offenders access to activities and inter-action with other inmates.
Classification interviews are generally limited to inter-action with booking or intake officers. The interviewing is done during the booking process at the booking counter. Inmate statements, disclosures and refusals are interpreted by the booking staff for housing assignment.
"Ideally, decisions pertaining to custody level, medical treatment, mental health care, and program participation should be based on standardized and precise criteria understood by staff and inmates."
A good example of a working subjective system is the town inebriate, Otis Campbell, in the Mayberry Jail.
Subjective classification data can be important and reliable. Valid subjective data comes through classification officer face-to-face interviews with inmates. The inmates attitude, demeanor, reasoning and other personal traits can only be assessed by a personal interview.
Even if the inmate lies, conceals, distorts, or withholds true and valid information, the fact is they said, or did not say the answer to your legitimate questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sample Subjective Classification Form - Police Lockup
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form Administration Instructions for Jail Staff
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naber Technical Enterprises
530-887-0122 Office
530-887-1092 FAX
581 Sawka Drive, Suite B
Auburn, CA. 95603
E-Mail bnaber@nteusa.org
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Updated 4/13/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|